Open with their website.
A short, automated review of a prospect's public site, written so you can send it to their CTO before the first call.
One site per review. Nothing is installed or logged in to.
Automated site review: example-shop.test
12 pages of https://example-shop.test, read on 2026-11-07 by Suite Builder's crawler in a real browser, logged out, as a first-time visitor sees them. Nothing was sent, bought or signed in to. This review reads the public site as it is served. It makes only the checks listed below (a check that did not run on this crawl is marked). It also observes the site's own security guards, as a visitor's browser sees them. It sends nothing and attacks nothing.
2 major, 1 minor. Major: lets a visitor or a search engine down now. Minor: worth fixing.
major4 broken links: the site links to addresses that answer an error
- Seen on
- /pricing, /blog, /about, 2 more pages
- Why it matters
- A visitor who follows one reaches a dead end, and a search engine reads the same dead end.
- Likely fix
- Point each link at the page that replaced it, or remove it.
minor2 different pages share one title
- Seen on
- /products/lamp, /products/lamp-2
- Why it matters
- Search results, bookmarks and browser tabs show the title: pages that share one can't be told apart.
- Likely fix
- Give each page its own title.
What you do, and what comes back
You send an address
The public address of one prospect's site. No access and no account are needed. The crawler names itself in its User-Agent, so it shows in the site's logs.
The site is read
A crawler opens it in a real browser, logged out, the way a first-time visitor would, and it follows robots.txt.
You get the review
A Markdown file and a web page, ready to attach to a note. Each finding says where it appears, why it matters and the likely fix.
What the review says, and what it leaves out
It says
- What a visitor or a search engine runs into on the pages it read, worst first.
- How many pages it read and when, so the reader knows how much it saw.
- Which of its checks ran on this site, which did not, and which it could not confirm. When it finds nothing, it says that, and never calls a site secure or clean.
It leaves out
- Attacks of any kind. It observes what a visitor's browser sees, such as security headers, and sends nothing. It is not a penetration test, and the review says which checks it made.
- Anything behind a login, and anything the site's robots.txt asks crawlers to skip.
- Opinions about the business. The findings come from fixed rules, so the same site gives the same findings until the site changes.